🔗 Share this article

The true crime category has an innovative format, or perhaps even a whole new language and structure: officer-worn camera recordings. Faces of victims, observers and possible perpetrators appear suddenly to the cameras, at times in the intense brightness of headlights or torches as the officers approach, their faces and voices expressing caution or panic or indignation or dubiously feigned naivety. And we frequently incidentally glimpse the expressions of the law enforcement personnel, one standing by blankly while the other asks the questions with what occasionally seems like extraordinary diffidence – though perhaps this is because they know they are being recorded.

An Emerging Pattern in Non-Fiction Cinema

We have previously seen the Netflix true-crime documentary American Murder: Gabby Petito, about the slaying of an social media personality by her partner, whose main point of interest was body cam footage and in which, as in this film, the law enforcement seemed surprisingly lenient with the perpetrator. There is also Bill Morrison’s Oscar-nominated short Incident, made exclusively of body cam film. Now comes a new film by Geeta Gandbhir about the tragic incident of a Florida mother in a city in Florida, a African American woman whose four young kids reportedly bothered and antagonized her neighbor, a local resident. In 2023, after an increasing number of neighborhood conflicts in which the authorities were summoned multiple times, the accused shot Owens dead through her closed front door, when Owens went to the neighbor's residence to confront her about hurling items at her children.

The Police Inquiry and State Laws

The investigating authorities found evidence that the suspect had done internet searches into the state's self-defense statutes, which allow householders and others to shoot if there is a significant presumption of threat. The movie builds its story with the body cam footage captured during the repeated police visits to the location before the killing, and then at the horrific and chaotic incident site itself – introduced by 911 audio material of Lorincz contacting authorities in a melodramatically shaky voice. There is also jail video of the individual which has a disturbing, unsettling appeal.

Portrayal of the Accused

The documentary does not really suggest anything too complex about the neighbor, or any mitigating factors. She is clearly unstable, although the kids are heard calling her a derogatory term, an hurtful taunt. The film is showcased as an illustration of how “stand your ground” laws generate senseless and tragic violence. But the fact of gun ownership and the constitutional right (that longstanding U.S. legal right that a deceased pundit notoriously said made firearm fatalities a price worth paying) is not much highlighted.

Officer Questioning and Firearm Norms

It is possible to watch the police interrogation scenes here and feel surprised at how little interest the police took in this point. At what time did she purchase the firearm? Did she receive any instruction on handling it? Was this the first time she discharged the weapon? How was the gun kept in her home? Was it just on the couch, loaded and ready? The authorities aren’t shown asking any of these surely relevant questions (though they may have done in recordings that were not included). Or is gun ownership so normal it would be like asking about microwaves or toasters?

Arrest and Aftermath

For what appeared to her neighbors a extended period, the suspect was not even taken into custody and indicted, only held and even offered a hotel stay away from home for the night (another point of comparison, incidentally, with the a prior incident). And when she was finally officially taken into custody in the detention area, there is an remarkable scene in which Lorincz simply refuses to stand, will not extend her arms for the cuffs, not aggressively, but with the politely self-pitying air of someone whose mental health means that she just can’t do it. Did the gentle handling up until that point led her to think that this might actually work?

Conclusion and Verdict

It was not successful; and the jury’s verdict is saved for the end titles. A very sombre portrayal of U.S. justice and consequences.